Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zacharyvoase's commentslogin

it was probably a rote translation of the German word ‘sonst’

Das denke ich auch.

I found it strange (merkwürdig) that they didn’t mention this in the article.


Yes something like wenn…dann…sonst?

I remember I heard this structure at Uni at some point.



What does lights-on mean?


humans supervising agents, not dark factory where agents supervise agents. providing a very high degree of automation, not fully automated. controls implemented using deterministic tools, not via markdown prayers.


opposite of 'lights-out', which in factory terms means a factory that's sufficiently automated that it can operate most of the time with the lights turned off because there's no people inside.


Are people supposed to know this?


It is becoming common nomenclature. I think I first heard about Dark Factory / "lights-off" in AI about a year ago now.

There's a similar concept in food delivery, where restaurants that only deliver food (eg Doordash / Uber Eats only) and don't have a physical store for customers are called Dark Kitchens. They try to automate as much of the food preparation as well.


i've heard them called "Ghost Kitchens" but apparently their "official" name is "Virtual Restaurants"[0]

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_restaurant


ai;dr


Not everyone is supposed to create.


The people who like creating don't use LLMs to do it, any more than the people who like cooking order takeout.


I know plenty of people who like to create—but who also have a better technical understanding of LLMs—who use LLMs in their workflows (some even use LLMs finetune LLMs on their own work and then incorporate them into their workflows.)

Most people who are non-technical (including most creators) have an extremely naive view of what LLMs are, mostly driven by what the media, and shills who are mostly targeting audiences that aren't creative are focused on, and their response to LLMs is shaped by that.


I should have said "the people who like to create don't use LLMs for the parts they like creating". I like making products that are easy to use and useful, I have LLMs write 100% of the code but I still do all the UX by hand, because that's what I enjoy.


AluminIum you say?


The name makes sense because Aluminium has an -ium suffix like Chromium. There's also no reason for the project name to agree with the US pronunciation of the element.


Well, it makes sense and it doesn't because it makes it sound like this is a 'lightweight' version of the Chromium-based products while the opposite seems to be true. Call it Osmium instead, that's got '-ium' and some weight to it just like this thing.


I appreciate your understanding of the Table Of Elements and their properties, but I don't think most people will care about the weight.

Maybe Osmium is/will-be an OS for their cloud clustering in future. IE something more heavyweight...


Team started in Australia, they use British spellings.


Technically they use Australian spellings, it's just that they overlap.


My dad always pronounced it a-luna-min, so my whole life I thought that there were 3 pronunciations, and the fact that there are only two correct ones feels strange to me. Not sure where he got that from, maybe he had special metal from the moon.


i am desperately awaiting the butlerian jihad ;_;


we cannot escape the AI generated slop can we?

online writing before 2022 is the low-background steel of the information age. now these models will all be training on their own output. what will the consequences be of this?


What website is this? It looks like fake news. Update: I did some searching around and this is definitely a fake news website.


I love how we have such a poor model of how LLMs work (or more aptly don't work) that we are developing an entire alchemical practice around them. Definitely seems healthy for the industry and the species.


The stuff that's showing up under the "context engineering" banner feels a whole lot less alchemical to me than the older prompt engineering tricks.

Alchemical is "you are the world's top expert on marketing, and if you get it right I'll tip you $100, and if you get it wrong a kitten will die".

The techniques in https://www.dbreunig.com/2025/06/26/how-to-fix-your-context.... seem a whole lot more rational to me than that.


As it gets more rigorous and predictable I suppose you could say it approaches psychology.


This is offensive to alchemy.


Reminds me of quantum mechanics


That’s not true actually. Like most things at law, it’s more complicated than that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: