Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zdhgbdthdtv's commentslogin

That's both a baseless accusation and a rude one at that.

Additionally, you are confusing stealing with making unauthorized copies.


It's called a rhetorical question.


Can we please stop with the mental gymnastics? Taking something without permission that doesn't belong to you is stealing. It may be justified stealing but it's still stealing.


It's not taking, though. It's copying.

Monks used to write books out by hand. If you were to go to a monastery, and copy a book line by line, you will have taken nothing at all. Nothing will be lost.

It's not taking, it's not stealing. It's just making a copy. You are the one doing gymnastics.


You're taking something that doesn't belong to you and copying it. It's stealing. In order to even make the "unauthorized copy" you mention, you have to take the thing first. That's the stealing.


There is no loss of data on either side. It's not stealing. Your argument is like saying that a picture of the Eiffel Tower is stealing.

Nothing is lost from copying.


Loss of data is irrelevant. If you don't have permission to take something or copy it, then you're stealing. Again, I think the benefits of what happened in this case are obvious so I'm not arguing the morality of this. I just think it's absolutely silly that people are bending over backwards to pretend that this isn't stealing and that the reason we have something that would have been otherwise lost is because someone had to balls to steal it.

It's stealing. You're taking something from the owner without permission. Just stop with the mental gymnastics.


It is not legally stealing whatsoever. Zero laws that cover "stealing" are applicable to copyright infringement.


No one gives a crap about your pedantry. I never said anything about "legally stealing". They took something that didn't belong to them and that they didn't have permission to give to someone else or copy. That's theft. It's stealing.


What if you already have access to it and don't need to "take" it from anywhere?


Having access to it is not the same as having permission to take it, make copies of it, or remove it or its copies from the owner.


> Not that simple.

It is. Postnord even sent a press release stating the same:

> "PostNord's position in a conflict that we are basically outside of, has been that the right to strike is constitutionally protected and therefore applies over the distribution obligation in the Postal Act," the company writes in a press release. [1]

1: https://www.dn.se/ekonomi/postnord-slar-tillbaka-mot-tesla-i...


Swede here. You are absolutely mistaken.

This is a huge deal in whole of Scandinavia. Today Finland unions joined in. The other day both Norway and Danish unions joined in. Before that, many other Swedish unions joined in.

This is Tesla versus the Scandinavian model rather.


What I find interesting is that nobody at Tesla seems to be able to realize that when you go abroad you can't just export your home country's attitude to labor relations and that Tesla as a brand is suffering, not just in Sweden, but in the Nordics as a whole and in the rest of Europe as well. Even if they win they lose, and not just a little bit.


I’m sure plenty of folks at Tesla have come to this realization. I’m also sure they are smart enough to keep it themselves.


That's what you get when you're surrounded by 'yes' people. It's one of the main reasons that power corrupts: you no longer have anything to calibrate with.


> heard that typescript is already falling

Don't believe in everything you hear.


Just use RetroPie


You are just being lucky. Youtube have been rolling out new adblock filtering globally for the last few weeks.

See https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/31/23940583/youtube-ad-bloc...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: