Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zwerdlds's commentslogin

"For 'whom' they voted."


That works too. I've done both and I currently use Just because it collects the entrypoints to the project into a single file. This can provide an advantage where there's a bit of interdependence across your entrypoints.

E.g: You have a docker container, you might be `run`ning it, `exec`ing it etc. from the same compose-file. So Just gives you the ability to link those shared commands within the same file. Once the entrypoints get too numerous you can either break them into scripts (I do this partially depending on the level of behavioral complexity in the script) or partition your justfiles and import them into a single master.


But... Your comment was an anecdote too?


safety arguments need to be statistical in nature

there's no such thing as perfect safety


Just make sure to keep an eye on your monthly statement. AT&T will arbitrarily decide that you should upgrade your plan and charge you more for it - despite your previous plan being perfectly within your usage.


Agreed. At what price do you think cruises internalize the externalized costs?


How do you even TRUST the leadership and that point?

I've been in this situation before, and the ideas in my head are basically paranoia. How do I trust that my manager isn't going to throw me under the bus in the next project? How would I EVEN KNOW?


Check his 2nd question on this site. https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/183956/what-is...

This shows even more worrying imbecils as his managers. He should leave now!


Will Cruise be taking centralized responsibility for the issues here? Will the person who caused the initial accident be held responsible?

I think it's very worthwhile to think of the overall improvements to safety while still acknowledging the arbitrage a corporation brings.



Just imagine if all $14000000000 of that went to the CEO & boards pockets and not just 29% of it. I'd expect less of these "well they saved lives" compliments for grift


Sounds like the most effective $1.4b the government has ever spent, $ per $.


Vore is just a latin root relating to eating. Vorarephilia is just one use of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vore


In common speech it's never used alone, but only as, as you said, a root, e.g. carnivore, omnivore. Just vore alone I've only ever heard to mean exactly one thing, and it's the NSFW one.


Pedo is Just a Greek prefix meaning child. And using it as a name for a project is an equally horrible idea.


My pedometer says otherwise


Different root word (pedi- means foot by way of Latin, and shouldn't be confused with Latin words like pedicare [provocative/aggressive verb meaning 'to buttfuck' (usually bowdlerized as something like 'to bugger')] which are also derived from the Greek pedo-)


Growing up, on the playground, you said, "actually what you just said is a symbol of power of the Roman consuls, so I will take that as a compliment.", didn't you?


> Apple have never bet such a huge chunk of their spending on a single tech that has been so resoundingly mocked.

I guess the 90's don't count anymore.


I mean...not really?

It's not particularly helpful to think of Apple before Jobs' return as iCEO and Apple afterward as the same company. His leadership philosophy and his vision for the company were so completely different than Gil Amelio and his fellow suits, any attempt to draw conclusions based on things that happened during that period is going to be an exercise in futility.

Unless, of course, all you want to do is score points dunking on Apple. Which has been a beloved pastime of many tech people for about 40 years now.


Apple in the 90s didn’t net itself on a single product.

Apple bet on a ton of products. Then they almost all failed to generate good returns, whether good, bad or average.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: