Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But with any complex interface, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a less complex facade that only deals with common usecases, and for complex use cases use that underlying interface?


The whole point of the complexity chrono interface is to prevent mistakes caused by accidentally mixing different units. Providing a default unsafe interface would completely defeat the point.


That an interesting point of view to take in defence of C++ of all things.


Sorry, I might misparsing your replay, but are you saying that std::chrono is overly strict? Or that because C++ (and its C heritage) has allowed unsafe implicit conversions in the past, it should continue doing it in the future?


Just that it feels strange to see safe defaults/interfaces used to argue for C++, nothing more.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: