> Find me some examples of violent feminists lynching and murdering men on the basis of feminist dogma.
How about violence towards men, based on their dogma? See Jordan Peterson in Toronto, among many others.
> Meanwhile, those with racist, bigoted, homophobic, and anti-semitic viewpoints continue to commit actual hate crimes, murders, campaigns of intimidation, and worse.
Which are all bad. And should be stopped.
But you're being intellectually disingenous if you believe that fighting all bigotry is bad, because some bigots are more violent than others.
> So yeah, you're making a typical strawman argument to deflect legitimate criticism and turn the conversation away from the topic at hand.
Only if you ignore all facts and reason.
Sorry.
> Not worth engaging you further on this point, but if you want to discuss the topic at hand, I'm all ears.
i.e. you don't want to admit to the bigotry and hostility I dislike, because you think it's not as bad as the bigotry and hostility you dislike. And, you're so full of yourself, that you're unwilling to learn from people who disagree with you. People who just might have reasons for their opinions.
In this mindset, the good people are (by definition) good, and can do no wrong. The bad people are (by definition) bad, and can do no right. You don't need to engage the bad people as people, because they're evil and despicable. You can just dismiss them out of hand.
A black man befriended KKK members, talked to them as people. He used friendliness, along with facts and reason, to convince them that racism was wrong.
Many (not all) of the people who say this really do believe it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
http://www.dailywire.com/news/8386/feminist-journalist-all-m...
> Find me some examples of violent feminists lynching and murdering men on the basis of feminist dogma.
How about violence towards men, based on their dogma? See Jordan Peterson in Toronto, among many others.
> Meanwhile, those with racist, bigoted, homophobic, and anti-semitic viewpoints continue to commit actual hate crimes, murders, campaigns of intimidation, and worse.
Which are all bad. And should be stopped.
But you're being intellectually disingenous if you believe that fighting all bigotry is bad, because some bigots are more violent than others.
> So yeah, you're making a typical strawman argument to deflect legitimate criticism and turn the conversation away from the topic at hand.
Only if you ignore all facts and reason.
Sorry.
> Not worth engaging you further on this point, but if you want to discuss the topic at hand, I'm all ears.
i.e. you don't want to admit to the bigotry and hostility I dislike, because you think it's not as bad as the bigotry and hostility you dislike. And, you're so full of yourself, that you're unwilling to learn from people who disagree with you. People who just might have reasons for their opinions.
In this mindset, the good people are (by definition) good, and can do no wrong. The bad people are (by definition) bad, and can do no right. You don't need to engage the bad people as people, because they're evil and despicable. You can just dismiss them out of hand.
Or, you can do what Daryl Davis did. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daryl_Davis
A black man befriended KKK members, talked to them as people. He used friendliness, along with facts and reason, to convince them that racism was wrong.