Wow no. Every rational person should be scrutinizing evidence. Not to do so woul... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mistercow on Feb 20, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-... Wow no. Every rational person should be scrutinizing evidence. Not to do so would be insane. But the evidence here clearly points in her favor.

qntty on Feb 20, 2017 [–]

When was the last time you read a legal brief for fun? "Scrutinizing evidence" here is a technical task done by experts.

mistercow on Feb 20, 2017 | [–]

You are defining evidence as "legal evidence", and you're the only one using that definition here.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact