Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Huh? The board was a major success, the only thing Theranos had going for it.


Typically we pragmatists consider guiding the company to avoid implosion as a criterion for a successful board.


Once you've got a company with no product and you're committing fraud to stay alive, what would the point be of staffing a board to tell you to kill yourself? What would you get out of that?

Do you think Theranos just didn't realize anything was wrong because the board didn't tell them?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: