>How would the share size impact the SEC's decision in this regard?
Critical to the SEC's decision is investor access to the products, so that less knowledgeable investors are protected from unsound investments.
A higher share price restricts access to wealthier investors, the type that meet the SEC’s requirements for accredited investors.
That is just one difference between this ETF and the Winklevoss one, you were unaware of it (and the implications) but still regarded VanEck as not "special," further highlighting how pointless generic "Bitcoin = bad" comments are on threads about specific topics.
Critical to the SEC's decision is investor access to the products, so that less knowledgeable investors are protected from unsound investments.
A higher share price restricts access to wealthier investors, the type that meet the SEC’s requirements for accredited investors.
That is just one difference between this ETF and the Winklevoss one, you were unaware of it (and the implications) but still regarded VanEck as not "special," further highlighting how pointless generic "Bitcoin = bad" comments are on threads about specific topics.