I wonder if the $20 payment was so that Facebook could plausibly claim they _wer... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		philipodonnell on Jan 30, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Apple blocks Facebook from running its internal iO... I wonder if the $20 payment was so that Facebook could plausibly claim they _were_ distributing internal apps to employees? I'm sure "employees" is defined loosely enough in the agreement to include "contractors", and the bar there is pretty low, getting paid pretty much makes you a contractor.

r00fus on Jan 30, 2019 | [–]

I'd bet if you look at their internal FIN system these "employees" weren't listed as 1099 vendors.

bashinator on Jan 30, 2019 | [–]

Minors generally not legally able to be held to a contract.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact