10 000 years is also 2x more than entire recorded history, and about the time since humans stopped being subject to biological evolution as the main driver of development.

10 000 years is a lot of time. Compared to other climate issues, with consequences expected in decades, this deserves at best a "cool, we'll fix that in a century or two, if technological civilization still exists by that time".

Maybe so. But it's a gamble. If species that we depend on go, such as pollinators, we'll be SOL.

On the other hand, I do agree with your practical assessment:

> "cool, we'll fix that in a century or two, if technological civilization still exists by that time".

Because, if for no other reason, it probably won't.

And there's also the fact that it's a human impact that can't likely be mitigated in any other way than collapse of the human population.