Are we really communicating here? I'm saying that there is a lot that physicists don't know about physics and that therefore it's impossible to make the assumption that you make, that every law of physics is computable. Because nobody knows all of them, and nobody knows what nobody knows, or how much of it there is.
And you're saying that, given high-school physics and "dabbling", we know all of it and it's all computable.
Are we really communicating here? I'm saying that there is a lot that physicists don't know about physics and that therefore it's impossible to make the assumption that you make, that every law of physics is computable. Because nobody knows all of them, and nobody knows what nobody knows, or how much of it there is.
And you're saying that, given high-school physics and "dabbling", we know all of it and it's all computable.
Is that a good summary of our discussion so far?