> who do not know anything about the case calling him a harrasser.
I know what I've been told by WMF, which is that he was a harasser and that en:wiki failed to stop his harassment.
I know also what I've read in the fram-gigantathread, where a bunch of admins describe him as kind of an asshole, and say that it's being going on for years, but then go on to excuse that because he makes a lot of edits.
> I know what I've been told by WMF, which is that he was a harasser and that en:wiki failed to stop his harassment.
There is another thing wrong with your comment: how could the English Wikipedia community attempt to stop Fram's alleged harassment if no harassment is known. Whether you want to sanction someone or just improve that someone's behavior, you have got to give an indication of what is wrong with their behavior.
> I know what I've been told by WMF, which is that he was a harasser and that en:wiki failed to stop his harassment.
> told by WMF
No comment.
> I know also what I've read in the fram-gigantathread, where a bunch of admins describe him as kind of an asshole, and say that it's being going on for years, but then go on to excuse that because he makes a lot of edits.
I know what I've been told by WMF, which is that he was a harasser and that en:wiki failed to stop his harassment.
I know also what I've read in the fram-gigantathread, where a bunch of admins describe him as kind of an asshole, and say that it's being going on for years, but then go on to excuse that because he makes a lot of edits.