Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have a simplistic test when it comes to hate. I take the part of the message that identity the target and I change it to the opposite side of the political spectrum. If the comment/speech still sound like hate then it is hate. Thus my definition for intolerance is intolerance when it is independent of the reader/authors opinion about the target.

A lot of people disprove of this approach, arguing that by doing so we ignore the oppressed or helping the oppressors, and thus we end up with different view about intolerance.



They're not disproving your approach: they're admitting tacitly that they have no moral compass in these matters apart from "evening up the score".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: