Side note:
I find the dismissal of the milkshakes to be a very disingenuous tactic.
From a group that promotes the idea that speech can be violence, the act of throwing any sort of projectile at anyone should be classified as a violent act without qualification.
You could argue that those milkshakes are also a form of stochastic terrorism as it demonstrates that those politicians are vulnerable. So those with the desire can reach them with something other than a milkshake.
I don't want to hear about how milkshakes aren't violence.
I want to hear why that violence is acceptable. Because, deep down, according to your actions, you think that sometimes violence is necessary.
From a group that promotes the idea that speech can be violence, the act of throwing any sort of projectile at anyone should be classified as a violent act without qualification.
You could argue that those milkshakes are also a form of stochastic terrorism as it demonstrates that those politicians are vulnerable. So those with the desire can reach them with something other than a milkshake.
I don't want to hear about how milkshakes aren't violence.
I want to hear why that violence is acceptable. Because, deep down, according to your actions, you think that sometimes violence is necessary.