> I'm paying them, if they don't want to be exploited by me don't accept my money.
If there is healthy competition among employers then workers have a real choice. If not then declining your money could mean: live destitute or starve.
As companies consolidate and collude (intentionally or subconsciously) even cushy office workers may face exploitation.
I own a sewing machine and I choose to sew clothes on it myself then sell it. Am I exploiting myself?
I own a sewing machine and I choose to not hire anybody to operate it and it sits unused. Someone that could operate it is sitting unemployed and unable to eat even though I could hire them. Am I exploiting someone?
I own a sewing machine and offer someone an amount of money if they operate it and produce the clothing I ask them to produce. Am I exploiting them?
I'm glad fringe maniacs that consider employment exploitation aren't taken seriously.
> It always comes down to violence with you people.
As it should. If they don't accept your power, they starve (or not get healthcare if we're talking about contemporary USA).
How is that any less violent? Because when you kill someone by starvation it's less bloody? Your kind are already using violence against us, you're just good at not caring about others or lying to yourself.
