Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure I understand your statements, at once you've said it's obvious to you their claim isn't valid but then you say this isn't a problem for you?

Merely looking for clarification, does playing Lawyer's advocate really work if you've already acknowledged the claim has no merit?



I said it's NOT obvious that it isn't valid.

I'm saying it's reasonable to argue as if the claim were valid to make my other point, that they should be a responsible steward of their IP.


My apologies, I completely misread the comment in parenthesis and did not realize having done so, but glad I sought out the clarification. Thank you.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: