You are describing a cervical smear test - target cells more likely to be mutated - assume that if you find problem cells in your test ( after you have destroyed during the test ) that there are similar ones still left in the body ( not because they were mutated together - but because they are related - one cell inherited a mutation from another ).
So sure. That's done already and having a test which detects 'precancerous' based on genetics might be useful. One of the problems at the moment is the treatment is often almost as bad as the cure - so you might only be able to step up frequency of the tests.
The problem with this approach is only certain bits of the body are easily accessible in this way - that's why people like the ctDNA tests - but they have their own challenges.
Another non-destructive way would be imaging - either thermal ( cancer cells are more active and so hotter than normal ), or using some sort of labelling markers - however can't see a way to target arbitrary early genetic mutations with this.
So sure. That's done already and having a test which detects 'precancerous' based on genetics might be useful. One of the problems at the moment is the treatment is often almost as bad as the cure - so you might only be able to step up frequency of the tests.
The problem with this approach is only certain bits of the body are easily accessible in this way - that's why people like the ctDNA tests - but they have their own challenges.
Another non-destructive way would be imaging - either thermal ( cancer cells are more active and so hotter than normal ), or using some sort of labelling markers - however can't see a way to target arbitrary early genetic mutations with this.