I think what they meant was that the board does not usually interact a lot with employees, or in a directly employee-facing way. Usually directors will interact with the board, both in terms of informing them and soliciting advice, and that turns into company direction, which funnels down through multiple layers before getting to ICs.
Few people can have more impact on the company than a board, but it's very typically abstracted away.
Few people can have more impact on the company than a board, but it's very typically abstracted away.