That's why the title doesn't fit. Unfair advantage is raw capitalism, not a distortion of it. What you're talking about is government interference in the markets, which is a form of socialism, which is a big no no in our society.
Why do so many people confuse supply-side economics propaganda with reality?
Government interference in the market isn't socialism, it's regulation. It's not socialism when the government ensures that companies have to compete fairly amongst eachother, minimise environmental hazards, safety test pharmaceuticals or respect labour laws. Even anti-trust laws or price controls aren't socialist. They're collectivistic, because they look after the greater good, but so are charities, some churches and , ideally, the justice system. None of those are "socialist".
Socialism (and only the statist variety, at that) is when government owns (part of) the means of production, and not even always in those cases, either. The US postal service isn't "socialist", it's a state-run public service. NASA isn't "socialist", it's a government agency funded with public funds.
Government intervention in our markets is the rule, not the exception. Whether we call it ‘socialism’ or ‘stabilization’ is simply a matter of who is making the sales pitch.
