> It's highly unlikely that the latter is more friendly to fringe or extremist views
This is empirically false though, at least in the the USA.
In the USA there are extremely strong protections for free speech.
If it was required that platforms followed the existing way that the government is allowed to ban certain speech, then platforms would be much less restrictive, because our laws of what speech is allowed is very pro free speech.
This is empirically false though, at least in the the USA.
In the USA there are extremely strong protections for free speech.
If it was required that platforms followed the existing way that the government is allowed to ban certain speech, then platforms would be much less restrictive, because our laws of what speech is allowed is very pro free speech.