Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The "system" for dieting is also simple (eat less, sport more), and yet many people struggle with that too. What would be really interesting is a scrum variety that is easy for people to follow without losing effectiveness.


> The "system" for dieting is also simple (eat less, sport more), and yet many people struggle with that too.

Yes, but do people then go around saying "this dieting thing is totally dumb and a complete waste of time", "I just don't get why anyone would go on a diet", etc.? And how do those who have managed to stick to a diet and think they have benefited from it look at such people? Because this is the attitude that I think I am seeing in many comments in this thread.


Scrum is not dieting, it is just a particular diet. Dieting is agile. And it turns out that Scrum, like all faddy diets, only works for a very small percentage of teams, probably due to their particular character.

That character of enjoying being micro-managed as far as I can tell.


> That character of enjoying being micro-managed as far as I can tell.

We still haven't established what is it about scrum that makes you say micromanagement. Do you regard all prescriptive statements as micromanagement? Is a software framework, such as Ruby on Rails, or Laravel, or Django micromanagement? Are code reviews micromanagement? Is version control with git micromanagement?


Bad scrum is like the product organization going on a diet but the product owners/managers are still addicted to eating junk food.

I like the analogy.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: