1. Air turnover is not the same as changeover. Turnover is only relevant if viral filtration is in place, which it generally isn't. Changeover is outside air, and for energy conservation, very little outside air is generally mixed in. (Some spaces do either or both of these. Airplanes provide an example of better filtration than usual, cruise ships are an example of more outside air than most buildings, and you can draw your own conclusions between those examples.)
2. Research shows takes less time to diffuse than you'd think, and lingers longer than you think. Since spring 2020 research has shown to wait till tomorrow if someone infected was in the space today.
3. Your own mask mitigates this, as does the amount of time you're breathing the infected space, as does the amount of human turnover (how many rolls of the dice of the space hosting an infected breather, and how long are they exhaling in the space).
1. The recommendation is 6-8 changes of outdoor air per hour. See ASHRAE 62.1. For comparison personal homes are recommended to change over their air 0.35 times per hour.
2. I would like to see that cross referenced against ventilation capacity. Again, restaurants are supposed to be changing their air over with outside air a lot, the idea that a properly ventilated space would have represent an infection risk days later is in the “doubt” category for me. Basically, please provide a source.
Heck, last time I was in Vegas I could barely smell people smoking a few feet away from me, the ventilation was that good. If cigarette smoke is the metaphor we’re going with for viral particles and dividers, that strongly implies that better ventilation yields a lower infection risk.
3. Exactly. This is an argument for masking when you’re not eating. It’s not 0 risk, but it’s lower. How much lower is debatable, and obviously depends on more circumstances than just masking policy alone.
Personally I’d rather just get takeout when local case loads are high, like right now.
> 2. Research shows takes less time to diffuse than you'd think, and lingers longer than you think. Since spring 2020 research has shown to wait till tomorrow if someone infected was in the space today.
Do you have a citation for this? I would be interested in reading this study.
2. Research shows takes less time to diffuse than you'd think, and lingers longer than you think. Since spring 2020 research has shown to wait till tomorrow if someone infected was in the space today.
3. Your own mask mitigates this, as does the amount of time you're breathing the infected space, as does the amount of human turnover (how many rolls of the dice of the space hosting an infected breather, and how long are they exhaling in the space).