You have the burden of proof, doubly so considering Chainlink has no working product which lives up to its promise. Not saying it’s impossible, but you shouting out a number and some terminology just makes it seem like you are emotionally invested in addition to financially.
First of all, I'm neither invested in ChainLink nor ETH. I'm interested in working on oracles.
Secondly, this is an informal discussion on a mainstream forum - one which is pretty strongly against crypto. So forgive me for not being super keen on writing PhD-level responses
The current white paper mentions that for a briber with at most `$d*(n^2 + n)/2`, where n is the number of oracle nodes, there exists a subgame perfect equilibrium for bribers to not issue the bribe and nodes to behave honestly. I can't seem to find a formal proof though.
If you bother to check the listed examples in the white paper, my hand-wavey "trillions of dollars" estimate wouldn't be even that far off, assuming wider adoption of Chainlink.
