That's been delegated to the diagrams and algebra -- and there's also the usual english-psuedocode interspersed throughout the chapters (presumably more so on the theoretical chapters e.g. chapter 4)
> Honestly, I think I'd prefer pseudocode that I can read to understand the idea and then work in my language of choice rather than C.
What stops you from understanding the idea by reading C? It's a tried-and-true language whose K&R version fits entirely in an easy to read ~180pg book which has real world applications, unlike pseudocode.
C code is usually rife with unrelated technical detail like manual memory management. It also lacks ways to build useful abstractions that exist in other languages.
