Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. Breaking this down by country doesn’t make much sense. Per capita emissions makes more sense, from a humanitarian point of view.

2. India/China are ramping up solar and wind but it is a relatively poor country. Such investments should be funded by countries that have already “developed” and have the ability to fund such change.



> Per capita emissions makes more sense, from a humanitarian point of view.

How so? Aren't most emissions generated by industry rather than by individuals?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: