Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I understand it, rescue breathing is indicated.


Yeah that’s the P in CPR.


Guidelines were changed for laypeople a while back because it turned out continuous chest compressions moved enough air and was more impactful in the first few minutes.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484593/


The reasoning I heard was that more people are comfortable giving chest compressions than rescue breaths, and we wanted to encourage people to help even if they weren't comfortable with rescue breaths


That's part of it.

> Available evidence strongly support the superiority of bystander compression-only CPR. Reasons for the best efficacy of chest compression-only CPR include a better willingness to start CPR by bystanders, the low quality of mouth-to-mouth ventilation and a detrimental effect of too long interruptions of chest compressions during ventilation.

People don't want to make out with a stranger, they don't do it very well, and pausing chest compressions detracts from it.


Yup.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: