Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So one has a right to privacy and the other doesn't? Are companies not allowed to secure their data?


They have the right to privacy when they are following the law. On the other hand, if police enforcement have a legal warrant to read internal documents about how you run your business, to prevent employees from being exploited, they absolute should get access to it.

I understand having a process in place to be able to hide data from criminals stealing your data, that's not a problem. The problem becomes when companies start to hide data from legal requests, which is what Uber is in the hot for here.


If they have a warrant they can ask the company to decrypt it.

Surely you're not advocating that every company should have to turn over all of its information without a warrant


[flagged]


That means everyone should just stop complying to lawful warrants? Or that laws in general don't work? Or that you'd rather have companies maintaining laws? We can pick & chose what laws to follow?

I'm not sure I understand the reasoning nor conclusion of your comment.


Yes. Yes. That is the status quo. That is the status quo.


People have rights because they are humans. Companies aren’t, and as such don’t inherently deserve any rights. They are granted some rights where it’s beneficial to the society, or because of corruption (often legalized as lobbying).


The company couldn't care less about privacy. As it is not human it has no feelings. Rather it is people – real live humans – who called for said "kill switch". It is they who seek privacy, not the company.


People have rights because they are citizens*.


Maybe in US; civilized countries obey Human Rights, not “citizen rights”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: