> And half of the stuff we read further is probably just his legend, i.e. not true.
Do you have any evidence of this, or are you just saying this? And what stuff are you saying is untrue? None of this sounded unbelievable to me. This man is someone who helped save the lives of several other soldiers who were being tortured at the time. If you're insinuating that his efforts are all fabricated based on no evidence, then it just seems like a weird thing to insinuate imo.
And here's something from 2005 with all the same details[0]. Everything else I've found seems to tell the same story, so I'm not sure why they would all be wrong (unless you're trying to say this is all some weird conspiracy or propaganda, which doesn't seem likely).
Do you have any evidence of this, or are you just saying this? And what stuff are you saying is untrue? None of this sounded unbelievable to me. This man is someone who helped save the lives of several other soldiers who were being tortured at the time. If you're insinuating that his efforts are all fabricated based on no evidence, then it just seems like a weird thing to insinuate imo.
And here's something from 2005 with all the same details[0]. Everything else I've found seems to tell the same story, so I'm not sure why they would all be wrong (unless you're trying to say this is all some weird conspiracy or propaganda, which doesn't seem likely).
[0]: https://web.archive.org/web/20050825035929/http://www.usni.o...