Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This isn't really the solution we were looking for Matt.

Can we replace the + operator with something else? How about¬? We don't use that very often to the point I don't even know what it's called, but it's there on the keyboard in one keypress.



I'll pass the feedback on. Part of the issue with + is that it turned out a lot of people were mistyping queries with + when as far as we could tell, they weren't trying to match an exact word. Getting further off the beaten path with a more rare character might help though.


Surely simpler soultion would have been to respond to a search for "+this is a +search" with:

Showing results for this is a search Search instead for +this is a +search

As google does for other "typos".

Failing that, a replacement for + would be welcome. I can't imagine many people type, for example ^word or =word - allowing use of a symbol that indicates promotion of that word word in the search terms, they way + did.

The difficulty will be reeducating the (presumably quite large number of - even if proportionally a small percentage of googles user base) people who have been using + in searches for the last 10-15 years (I'm almost positive this concept existed in other search engines before google) that + isn't + any more, and please use this other symbol instead.


Currently Google offers me the ability to change the background image on the Google home page.

How about the ability to use something like Google "classic" with the old way of using the + sign?

Hide it as an off-home page selection, that way only people who really want it will choose it.

I'd also be interested in something similar for an "advanced search syntax" mode. Probably not very useful for the majority of people, but could be something a minority might be very passionate about.


Exclamation point? (!this !word !exactly, !darnit!) Or a double exclamation point if that's still too common...

It really was nice to be able to control which words were verbatim and which weren't. Quotes are perfectly logical but just a pain to retrofit onto a query you're refining.


What about the equals sign?

=exactstring


Westlaw search syntax would be awesome!!!


That's the symbol for logical negation, which would make it a confusing replacement for +.


That character is most often used as a logical negation operator, so it may be confusing to use it as a force-inclusion operator for search.

It's also almost never found on standard US keyboards, which is why the tilde is often used as a logical negation operator in it's place.


Speak for yourself. I've been wanting this solution for years.


> This isn't really the solution we were looking for

What? Yes, yes it is. Please don't take it away now!


Not on US keyboards, I don't think.


I've looked all over my German keyboard, with its crazy-assed bracket locations, and I don't see it anywhere.


My UK keyboard has it left of the '1' key above the qwerty keys


I have carat and a little circle. The bastards.


Depends on your OS. ¬ is a quick alt+l on any Mac. However, it's the symbol for logical negation[1], and thus probably not a great substitute for +.

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C2%AC


On Windows, you have to do Alt+0172 to get a ¬ unless there's some shortcut I don't know offhand.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: