Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There really seems to be a lot of mental gymnastics going on here.

Your original point was that casinos are allowed to operate because of their "lack of intent". I respond that it's actually because they're as heavily regulated as banks are. Your response is, "But sometimes they break the law!"

Who cares? Casinos are heavily regulated and most of the time they follow their regulations. Or they would be shut down.

And here we go back to the real original point... what regulations were Tornado Cash following? Were they ever following AML/BSA regulations? Did they do anything significant to attempt to comply with regulations that all money exchange companies have to comply with?

Seriously, take 2 minutes and read this:

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0916

Your little example of Casino money laundering was $47 million and was touted as “the largest all-cash, up-front gambler the Venetian-Palazzo had ever had to that point,”.

Now read that link from treasury.gov:

Tornado Cash, which has been used to launder more than $7 billion worth of virtual currency since its creation in 2019. This includes over $455 million stolen by the Lazarus Group, a Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) state-sponsored hacking group

It's not even comparable. $47 million is 0.6% of $7 billion. Tornado Cash's raison d'être was money laundering and it was right to shut them down.



Out of curiosity, what was the total volume of funds processed over the same time period? I haven’t been able to find that anywhere.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: