Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Covid vaccine injury payouts explode to $77M, budget reveals (news.com.au)
35 points by sfusato on Nov 19, 2022 | hide | past | favorite | 19 comments


How several jurisdictions are responding to COVID vaccine injuries:

Asia:

$1.26m paid to 296 with serious side effects after COVID vaccination in Singapore https://news.yahoo.com/296-payout-serious-side-effects-covid...

Girl to receive NT$3 million payout for adverse COVID vaccine reaction https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202209080026

Man gets NT$400,000 payout for adverse COVID-19 vaccine reaction https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202210150017

North America:

Feds Pay Zero Claims For Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries/Deaths https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/11/04/fed...

B.C. man among first approved for Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program still waiting for compensation https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/b-c-man-among-firs...


I imagine north America has become so politicized that they want to minimize payoffs lest they give “anti-vaxxers” ammunition.


This subject is so vexing, because historically Big Pharma has consistently shown to be untrustworthy in how they conduct their business.

That has to be countered with the societal value of the vaccines they produce. The anti-vax movement creates an awkward dance of defending big pharma to deliver this aid whilst knowing that the cannot be trusted 100% to do the right thing.


It wasn't the people against the Covid vaccine who were licking the boots of Big Pharma, it was the other people using force and shame to try and get a shot in every arm.


I may be a vaccine proponent, but I do recognize the problem of forcing someone to be "medicated" against their wishes.

That's balanced by the fact that I think virtually all the reasoning against it is specious at best. I don't have a better answer for that problem other than the force and shame be as thoughtful and accommodating as possible.

The shame is valid in the context of the proposition that vaccine efficacy is at its best when a significant portion of the population is vaccinated. By not participating in this particular social contract one is not "doing one's fair share".

Obviously if one doesn't accept that proposition, the shame is unnecessary. C'est la guerre.


The problem with the "doing one's fair share" argument is that we were lied to by the government, Pfizer admitted in testimony they never tested the vaccine against transmission, which explains why so many vaccinated people can't seem to stop getting and spreading Covid.

So now that they've destroyed the trust, where do we go from here? For instance, I've never met anybody who didn't get their kids the regular vaccinations (Measles, mumps, rubella etc) I'm sure those people exist, but they're rare which means we mostly trusted our government on the question of vaccines. This debacle has ruined that trust, so how do we get it back when it really matters?


A quick search on your complaint re transmission shows that it's without merit: https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/vaccines-veri...

And "government" is not a homogeneous body with consistent understandings/incentives/etc.

Prior to the previous administration vaccines were not political. They were the fringe group of conspiracy theorists for the most part. I don't consider them personally political but it's very much wound into millions of people that being anti-vax is part of their political identity.

tl;dr -- vaccines are never 100% safe nor 100% effective and it's a case of risk assessment on the value of participating. I'd wager that very few of those who've turned their backs on them have done an honest calculation.


That's...a blog.

Meanwhile, you can watch the testimony yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnxlxzxoZx0

They never tested the vaccine effectiveness against transmission. It is in testimony.


The anti-vax movement had nothing to do with anyone defending Big Pharma. Claiming they did is an obvious lie meant to gaslight people into continuing that defense.

Anyone who defends big pharma and gaslights other people into doing so as well has made their own, free, morally corrupt choice.


Being that vaccines are made by Big Pharma, and the anti-vax movement says we can't trust vaccines one has to imply that one can trust Big Pharma because we have to trust what they are delivering.

Of course this nuance might be beyond many, as it's consistently acknowledged that vaccines do come with some risk and that efficacy is not 100 percent guaranteed.

edit: first statement was awkward but essence is the same


> because we have to trust what they are delivering

Only if you're gaslighting for big pharma, which seems to be something you're very comfortable with. But keep blaming others for your own evil.


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Pro tip: being an asshole isn't going to help win any arguments. All you've done is demonstrate why anti-vaxxers are beyond reason.


Too late to edit out the pro-tip but it still stands. Accusing me of being evil and a shill for Big Pharma is is unacceptable behavior for a forum that promotes thoughtful discussion rather than emotional tirades.


> The compensation scheme, which is currently scheduled to end on April 17, 2024, allows Australians to claim for medical costs, lost wages or other expenses if they suffer an adverse reaction to a Covid vaccine.

So basically you could have the common, harmless flu-like side effects of the vaccine, take few days off of work, and file for compensation.


Keep reading:

But potential applicants and legal experts have criticised it as overly complex and difficult to access, since a medical professional is required to sign off on documentation linking the reaction to the vaccine, and only a small number of officially recognised side effects such as myocarditis are covered.

Figures released earlier this month showed out of 2987 people to apply for compensation, only 59 were successful, with experts describing the rate of payouts as “absolutely pitiful”.


> Figures released earlier this month showed out of 2987 people to apply for compensation, only 59 were successful

Even if 100% of these were successful this would still mean the vaccines were complication free for the vast, vast majority of people. Even if you assume the complexity of the process meant that 1 in 10 people who thought they had an adverse reaction were put off applying, it'd be something like 0.1% of cases having adverse reactions.

Of course I'd tend to trust medical professionals figuring out if a payout was relevant a little bit more than the applicants or 'legal experts' that are complaining about the complex process.

(Anecdata: I know of one person in my entire network who had an adverse reaction (outside of cold/flu symptoms) - bursitis in his elbow - from a COVID vaccinte. I personally only ever got a mild headache from the first one & nothing more from the others I've had.)


I think it’s reasonable to say these risks were not adequately communicated to the public.


> I think it’s reasonable to say these risks were not adequately communicated to the public.

As with pretty much every vaccination for all time, the vanishingly tiny risks are massively outweighed by the benefits.

But yes, the risks should be communicated. Maybe they are not in some areas? I feel like most times when I get a vaccination, I am reminded of the potential risks. Here they always make you wait 15 minutes after the shot for observation just in case there are any immediate adverse affects (this is in Australia).

Here, for the first two COVID shots (at least) there was a reasonably intense screening process which ran through things like heart issues, etc.


> As with pretty much every vaccination for all time, the vanishingly tiny risks are massively outweighed by the benefits.

You're not aware of past vaccine disasters, vaccines withdrawn from market over safety concerns .etc? Here's from the CDC's mouth, a source I wouldn't call neutral at all: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history....




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: