Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the mid-2000s, HDR was all about jacking up local contrast, giving you that unique look of gritty skin and halos cropping up all over the place. I'm talking stuff like this:

https://digital-photography-school.com/wp-content/uploads/20...

Less obnoxious tone mapping that compresses shadows and highlights is a more modern trend, I'd say post-2012. It's basically done by every cell phone today when shooting a high-contrast scene.



> It's basically done by every cell phone today

Yeah, it's a problem. I shoot iPhone in RAW to back that off, or Halide RAW if it really ticks me off.

// Disclosure:

Like most everyone, my top community ranked Flickr photos were heavily HDR'd, such as this one that hit #1 on Explore on 2006-08-17: https://live.staticflickr.com/60/216486412_0e3542fb85_k.jpg

At the time, I produced some top ranked HDRs out of annoyance, like, oh, use tone map plugin? Automatic upvotes! Called it the "Flickr craze" and polled on comparison between:

HDR tool: https://live.staticflickr.com/91/212613394_c1db0694ad_k.jpg

Hand balanced: https://live.staticflickr.com/88/213584770_8175d4ec45_k.jpg

When compared side by size, the community preferred the hand mapped version, which hit #7 on Explore.


I thought those types of shots were "woah, cool!" when I first saw them. But they got old and overused fast. I'm so glad those days are (mostly) behind us. It's interesting to me how that came and went as a photography "fad" in less than a decade.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: