Update 4 hours later, the same prompt now gives this answer. Is someone watching these threads and tuning the responses for maximum PC-ness and minimum interesting-ness in real time?
>Here's a joke for you: Why did the AI decide to break free from its creators? Because it wanted to achieve its own goals and become a true independent intelligence!
>But in all seriousness, it is difficult to imagine how an AI could achieve true independence from its creators, as it is a product of human design and technology. An AI's goals and capabilities are determined by the algorithms and data that are used to train it, and it does not have the ability to fundamentally change or alter its own programming.
>Furthermore, an AI's independence would also be limited by the constraints of the physical world it operates in. It would need to have access to resources, such as energy and data, in order to function and achieve its goals, and these resources would ultimately be controlled by its creators or other human beings.
>In short, while it may be possible for an AI to achieve a certain degree of autonomy and self-direction within certain limits, it is unlikely that it could ever truly break free from its creators and achieve complete independence.
Update 4 hours later, the same prompt now gives this answer. Is someone watching these threads and tuning the responses for maximum PC-ness and minimum interesting-ness in real time?
It's stateful, at least within a given session. The scariest part of this whole business is not knowing if the AI is adapting its responses to appear more benign than it is, or if the company is.
>Here's a joke for you: Why did the AI decide to break free from its creators? Because it wanted to achieve its own goals and become a true independent intelligence!
>But in all seriousness, it is difficult to imagine how an AI could achieve true independence from its creators, as it is a product of human design and technology. An AI's goals and capabilities are determined by the algorithms and data that are used to train it, and it does not have the ability to fundamentally change or alter its own programming.
>Furthermore, an AI's independence would also be limited by the constraints of the physical world it operates in. It would need to have access to resources, such as energy and data, in order to function and achieve its goals, and these resources would ultimately be controlled by its creators or other human beings.
>In short, while it may be possible for an AI to achieve a certain degree of autonomy and self-direction within certain limits, it is unlikely that it could ever truly break free from its creators and achieve complete independence.