Assuming it’s the classic trolley problem, what would be the crime? There doesn’t seem to be specific intent for murder (the death is a regrettable side effect), and diverting the train to save lives is certainly not reckless disregard for human life so manslaughter seems to be out.
By the way do you think someone would go to jail for swerving a car away from a crowd and hitting just one person as a result?
Don’t you need some kind of intentional “bad behavior” for involuntary manslaughter? I thought it required committing another unlawful act or being so reckless/negligent that it essentially meets that standard.
Some classic examples are petty thefts where the victim has a heart attack, or a medical practitioner acts outside their legal authority (e.g., while unlicensed) or egregiously failing to act despite having a duty of care.
Good point. Reckless behavior may not mean "swerving to save someone else" which is what pulling a lever would be. I struggle with with the Trolley Problem because the pulling of the lever is always intentional.
> Don’t you need some kind of intentional “bad behavior” for involuntary manslaughter?
You have act with recklessness or criminal negligence (or, where a misdemeanor manslaughter rule exists, commit a misdemameanor that resulted in the death.) None of these, except some misdemeanors, require intentional wrongdoing.
I thought the reckless act (not the ensuring harm) still had to be deliberate: you knew (or should have known) something was overly risky and yet you did it anyway. Speeding as part of a drag race is reckless; speeding because the accelerator was stuck open is, I think, not.
In the trolley problem, you certainly can't be negligent (unless you own the trolley line or something). I'm not sure you could be called reckless either if your decision was meant to do the most good.
I don't know if practicing medicine without a license is a felony, but robbery is. In case of a death that occurred as a result of robbery you would probably be charged with felony murder, which does not take into account intent to commit murder, just intent to commit a felony.
Right, but that’s still “bad behavior.” In some places felony + someone dies = felony murder :: misdemeanour + someone dies = involuntary manslaughter.
I think the minimal pair is something like losing control of a car and fatally swerving into another car because:
- you were driving like a maniac and hit ice==> culpable
- you were driving prudently for the overall conditions, but hit oil spilled on a dark road (or something else unforseeable) ==> not.
By the way do you think someone would go to jail for swerving a car away from a crowd and hitting just one person as a result?