> The original creator of the company will care about that because they know why they are trying to solve the problem. Everyone that comes after will not.
A good follow up question is why not make CD Baby a non-profit instead of for-profit? Being a non-profit foundation would telegraph to everyone, including future leadership, where their priorities should lie.
A non-profit is largely motivated to stay alive, just like a for-profit, but mainly does it by asking for money from rich people rather than selling things.
Also, the extra accounting and regulation is intense for a small organization.
Much of the wealth a non-profit generates can get lost on large salaries and expense accounts. A charity might have more rules and send a stronger signal.
But having said that the creator could make tons of money and then shut it down because it is not needed. That's perfectly logical
A good follow up question is why not make CD Baby a non-profit instead of for-profit? Being a non-profit foundation would telegraph to everyone, including future leadership, where their priorities should lie.