To my eye, kmeisthax's comment appears to be entirely accurate.
Well, that is to say, that assuming the facts that listed are accurate, then I agree with the conclusion: it's not "open source" at all. (And certainly not Libre.)
The things you said do not describe an open source project.
The point here is that the title of this thing is incorrect. If the ML community doesn't agree, it's because they are (apparently) walking around with incorrect definitions of "open source" and "Free Software" and "Libre Software".
To my eye, kmeisthax's comment appears to be entirely accurate.
Well, that is to say, that assuming the facts that listed are accurate, then I agree with the conclusion: it's not "open source" at all. (And certainly not Libre.)
The things you said do not describe an open source project.
The point here is that the title of this thing is incorrect. If the ML community doesn't agree, it's because they are (apparently) walking around with incorrect definitions of "open source" and "Free Software" and "Libre Software".