I find it somewhat problematic that the author does not disclose that she built her career not just around intellectual property, but specifically the business of licensing content.
On one hand, that makes her an expert in the legal aspects of this case. On the other hand, generated content presents a substantial threat to her current income stream.
"As a former copyright startup founder equipped with a law degree and a long-standing career at the intersection of intellectual property (IP) law, media and tech..."
Seems like the author was pretty clear to me about their history.
Nah, the same description (minus the startup) could apply to Micheal Geist who would have a very different perspective and would fall much closer to what most would consider a neutral student of technology and copyright law.
On one hand, that makes her an expert in the legal aspects of this case. On the other hand, generated content presents a substantial threat to her current income stream.