> The fact that false memories can be induced does not mean that all memories are false.
How is this even slightly relevant?
If some memories are false, and other memories are true, and none of us can tell which is which, then according to our principles of justice we must act as if all memories are potentially false.
How is this even slightly relevant?
If some memories are false, and other memories are true, and none of us can tell which is which, then according to our principles of justice we must act as if all memories are potentially false.
"Memory as evidence" crumbles at that point.