Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My experience with open source models places them as a little bit worse than GPT 3, and nowhere close to GPT3.5.

That said:

- For many uses, it doesn't matter. For many of the ways I use it, I don't care. For basic use (e.g. clean up an email for me), it's basically the same. For things like complex reasoning, algorithms, or foreign languages, the hosted service is critical.

- GPT3-grade models have more soul. OpenAI trained GPT3.5 and 4 to never do anything offensive, and that has a lot of negative side effects, well-documented in research. The way I'd describe it, though, is the difference between talking to a call center rep and your grandma (with mild Alzheimer's, perhaps). They both have their place.

- Different models are often helpful in workflows.

My experience is anecdotal. Please don't take it as more than one data point. If other people post their anecdotal experiences, you'll get the plural of "anecdote."



> OpenAI trained GPT3.5 and 4 to never do anything offensive, and that has a lot of negative side effects, well-documented in research.

I'm absolutely disgusted by OpenAI for this "do no offense" approach. How can people so smart be so damn uneducated?

Then again, this industry has disgusted me for a long time so it's not really a surprise.


Would you write a check to fund a business that could potentially self-destruct via lawsuits alone? In the end, the best model will not be owned by a mega corp like MicrOpenAI. It may be the most popular, but it will be the equivalent of the sanitized version of history students learn in school. The best model will have no problem telling you, very factually, that the hallways of Versailles used to smell like sh--.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: