Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If the measurement is based on sales there will also be an obvious increase after legalization as the majority of sales are recorded.

This may be true, but it’s the best measuring that we have. I don’t know if it’s worth throwing out the existing measures we have from before and after legalization on a hunch that it might be different results. The surveys try to account for this as much as they can.

I agree that people shouldn’t be punished for their drug use, but I think the point is that without punishment, drug use increases. And there are some negative impact from that increase.



It has proven untenable to treat this with law enforcement. It's too susceptible to bias, and creates a large class of people labeled as "criminals" the rest of their lives. It demonstrates an incredible lack of imagination that a large percentage of Americans can't see any way to handle this other than making things illegal, especially when we have a clear analog with alcohol.

If most people can handle having alcohol readily available, then those same people should be able to have other drugs readily available.


What do you propose? We just ignore all data and consult the elders?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: