This tone doesn't feel especially productive. You asked:
> So what you're saying is that we're A-OK as a society with the gatekeeping of critical safety information behind private paywalls and copyright.
but the comment you're responding to explicitly said:
> I agree with the decision and in principle absolutely agree with what you are saying about our laws.
So like... they're obviously not saying what you're accusing them of saying. They're just explaining why this litigation occurred in the first place (and agreeing with the outcome, which seems to be the outcome you also want).
> So what you're saying is that we're A-OK as a society with the gatekeeping of critical safety information behind private paywalls and copyright.
but the comment you're responding to explicitly said:
> I agree with the decision and in principle absolutely agree with what you are saying about our laws.
So like... they're obviously not saying what you're accusing them of saying. They're just explaining why this litigation occurred in the first place (and agreeing with the outcome, which seems to be the outcome you also want).