Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think such penalties were applied to GPT-2 or even GPT-3, yet they weren't repetitive like that.


Yes, they are applied. Here's OpenAI doc which describes how to set various sampling parameters for GPT-3:

https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/completions/c...

See presence_penalty and frequency_penalty.

Sampling techniques is one of important arts of LLMs, you'll can find a lot of papers on them.

In general, smaller are more prone to repetition, but you can get caught in it even with larger models.


To clarify: I meant that in general they are commonly applied, but in this case they weren't as the author confirmed. The repetition, of course, doesn't happen all the time.


Yes, you're right, I should have mentioned it in the post, but I used pure greedy sampling for the GPT-2 outputs since I couldn't do anything but that for the Apple model. So temperature was set to zero, and there was no repetition penalty.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: