Of course it has, and we all know it. He's now been proven to be "that guy who had rape accusations" by "multiple women". Or the "controversial figure known for his wild antics and potentially non consensual dealings with women in the past".
It's all just the start of a large machine thats been set in motion. Every news outlet that doesn't like him or doesn't want to portray him in a neutral or positive light will use this. They'll never say anything that can be factually proven wrong. This allows them to have selective bias which drives an agenda and is steering the thoughts of their readers into a specific direction.
What an absolutely deranged comment. Putting aside the fact that you're going up to bat for some random guy that you don't personally know. Instead of listening to the testimonies, let it go to court and then make a judgement. But the thought of preemptively supporting a stranger that's been accused of rape is actually insane.
And if news outlets don't want to work with him then they can just stop inviting him to things. They don't need to accuse him of anything. Just stop giving him roles and he's out of the spotlight. He'll fade away into obscurity.
Take your meds and get off the internet for a bit.
This is the kind of delusional thinking that just doesn't work in the real world.
Because in the real world there are defamation laws. There are serious consequences for news organisations that publish accusations that are not able to be corroborated. Especially so when the claims are so significant i.e. multiple rape/sexual assaults.
Which is why despite apparently everyone in the comedy and entertainment industries knowing this was going on for 20+ years no allegations have made their way into the media.
