(If you disagree, don't just click the down arrow, argue your point.)

Consider making a coherent argument maybe? I asked whether for sources on a specific (and, if true, unprecedented) accusation, and you say some generalities that, I think, imply that of course they would do that! That doesn’t address my question at all. But to be fair I’m not even sure that that was your argument.

It’s customary on HN to downvote comments without much substance. (Fwiw I didn’t downvote it)