Your second footnote doesn't follow at all. I'm sure the star-bellied sneetches would be far more likely to be in favor of a star-belly supremacist platform as compared with the star-less. The right consistently embraces overt sexism to appeal to their religious zealot base, so it should be no surprise that women tend away from them.
Could you restate what you're trying to tell in normal unbiased language? It would make it easier (or 'possible') to react to your statement. Take out the labels and expletives and come back with what's left (if any).
I'm sorry, I assumed everybody was familiar with the classic Dr. Seuss story "The Sneetches", which is about a race of bird things where some have stars on their bellies and some don't but are otherwise indistinguishable but have a segregated society that devolves into chaos when some guy makes a machine that can add or remove stars. The whole thing is an allegory for racism, but it applies here:
You state that women shying away from the right is evidence of fundamental sexual differences, when in fact the right has made a point of adopting anti-women positions which make them unappealing to all but the most self-sabotaging.
> I assumed everybody was familiar with the classic Dr. Seuss story "The Sneetches"
Dr. Seuss is not really part of a Dutch or Swedish upbringing. We do get a whiff every now and then but the Sneetches? Nope.
> You state that women shying away from the right is evidence of fundamental sexual differences
You mistake correlation with causation. I state that women on average are more liberal leaning while men on average lean more towards conservatism. I did not state why this was so, only that it is so. As to why women on average lean more towards liberalism I suspect it does not have much to do with your statements about 'the right' but is related to the fact that women on average score significantly higher on the agreeableness and compassion scales than men do [1], two traits which are more prevalent in those who tend towards liberalism [2].
On the subject of 'the right' having adopted 'anti-women positions' I´ll state that it depends on your political opinion as to whether those positions are 'anti-women' or not. The fact that there are plenty of women on 'the right' who do not agree with your claim should give you cause to doubt the absolute veracity of your claim - unless you also insist that women on 'the right' are somehow not informed about what 'the right' has in mind for them? If you think it through a bit you'll find that it is your own (or your own community's/your own group's) political bias which informs this statement. Simone de Beauvoir [3] made a statement in a 1975 interview [4] with Betty Friedan [5] which clearly shows what I mean:
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one… In my opinion, as long as the family and the myth of the family and the myth of maternity and the maternal instinct are not destroyed, women will still be oppressed.”
A woman of conservative persuasion most likely considers that statement to be proof of the authoritarian and revolutionary bent of these liberals or, to restate this in your terminology, 'the fact that the left has made a point of adopting anti-women positions which make them unappealing to all but the most self-sabotaging'.
