Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Near as I can tell the fundamental problem was that the GoldOwner and GoalDonor weren't the same. The customer feeding stories to the team didn't care about the same things as the managers evaluating the team's performance. This is bad, and we know it's bad, but it was masked early because we happened to have a customer who was precisely aligned with the IT managers. The new customers who came on wanted tweaks to the existing system more than they wanted to turn off the next mainframe payroll system. IT management wanted to turn off the next mainframe payroll system. Game over. Or not, we'll see... -- KentBeck

> So, I'm curious - does this represent a failure of XP? -- AnonymousCoward

> Sensitivity, certainly. But if the people who tell you what to do don't agree with the people who evaluate what you are doing, you're stuffed, XP or no XP. -- KentBeck

http://wiki.c2.com/?CthreeProjectTerminated

Between this and the Wikipedia article, it's not clear to me that the project failed due to XP practices.



While C3 might not be strong evidence against XP neither should it be considered evidence _for_ XP.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: