- he has a big place. As far as I can see, he worked for it. Nice
What I see from his company ( my so called bias):
- fair in the amount of possible, growing pains
- accurate quarterly reports ( low balling future revenue) with detailed info on delicate things and interesting perceptions ( eg. Marketing headcount replacement during mass layoffs in other companies) - new boss in the department too then
- good products that I want to use, interesting approaches ( eg. Egress costs vs. ml ingress). My employer uses them
- potential cloud competitor ( huge market)
Business wise. Sure, I'm biased because of my past analysis :)
I have them based on how it's management is, the company/employees and the product.
I'm not saying there couldn't be an ethical issue.
I'm saying I don't see proof atm. I see suggestions in that direction, but not proof.
There are many unknowns here and I'm giving the benefit of doubt based on past perception, but yeah, I don't know him in person.
What I think:
- neighbor feud, never fun. We don't know a root case
- a newspaper that got bought close to where he grew up. There are tons of variables to consider here. Perhaps read their interpretation and take it into consideration: https://www.parkrecord.com/opinion/tatiana-and-matthew-princ...
- he has a big place. As far as I can see, he worked for it. Nice
What I see from his company ( my so called bias):
- fair in the amount of possible, growing pains
- accurate quarterly reports ( low balling future revenue) with detailed info on delicate things and interesting perceptions ( eg. Marketing headcount replacement during mass layoffs in other companies) - new boss in the department too then
- good products that I want to use, interesting approaches ( eg. Egress costs vs. ml ingress). My employer uses them
- potential cloud competitor ( huge market)
Business wise. Sure, I'm biased because of my past analysis :)