Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers - just that this particular ruling is not related (directly/legally) to the actions of the Supreme Court justices themselves.


> I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers

Not here, but six Supreme Court Justices have done exactly that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: