Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Search would just farm out ads or develop their own again: its two sides of the same paper, by necessity.

Chrome is a loss leader and if cut out to it’s own company will die, because browsers are not a business that can make money anymore (same with eg C compilers for x86), AI maybe, but the only advantage AI has at google is that it has a crap-ton of data to train it with. Without that? The market just has one less AI product.

Regardless of how you split it, whomever ends up with search ends up with the value. And I guess the only way to split search would be into a background service api you could query and then have the front page be its own business. Others could then buy access, but the problem with that is that you then have a supplier that has all the power…



> Chrome is a loss leader and if cut out to it’s own company will die, because browsers are not a business that can make money anymore

That's the definition of anti-copetitive monopoly abuse, not an argument against doing something about it.


Except that Firefox was there first with a free unbundled browser.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: