Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not parent, but Chevron was about deference to agencies, not about whether courts should adhere to legislative intent. The original Chevron ruling was written by a well-known originalist, who usually didn't abide by legislative intent.


i.o.w. it was about whether Congress just has to write the intent, or whether it has to write the full implementation too.


No. Why would you say something that you know is obviously false?

Everyone knows the New Deal administrative state existed. I'd really appreciate it if leftist extremists would stop trying to convince us it didn't.


sure, but agency interpretation is only possible within the vagaries of the legislation. that's 100% synonymous with intention/implementation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: